jump to:allmastodonblueskylemmylobstersdevstackwikirsshn
wwebbit
view: | | |

Tech / everything · hot matching “show”

7 shown · updated 4m ago · read only
  1. Fixing hotspot in C++ [closed] (stackoverflow.com)stack

    22 points by CSGuy in stackoverflow.com · 1h ago · stack

    Currently working on optimizing some code in C++ for performance. The code I'm looking at takes a file and reads it in binary and then reads one character at a time, shown here. while (file.get(c)) { // do work } Any ideas/tips on how to speed this up?
  2. ‘Show How 3M Is 0% at Fault:’ Expert Witness Used ChatGPT to Write Report Defending Company in Deadly Explosion Lawsuit / ChatGPT prompts show how an expert witness report was created in a $61 millio… (404media.co)lemmy

    39 points by u/sanitation in c/technology · 1h ago · 1 lemmy

    Full title: ‘Show How 3M Is 0% at Fault:’ Expert Witness Used ChatGPT to Write Report Defending Company in Deadly Explosion Lawsuit / ChatGPT prompts show how an expert witness report was created in a $61 million lawsuit over an explosion that killed three people.
    filed under technology
  3. Trump 2.0 has deleted or altered nearly 400 US datasets, endangering public health, education and more (theguardian.com)lemmy

    13 points by u/GolfFoxtrotLima in c/science · 16m ago · lemmylemmy

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50808662 > ***Health data appears to be most affected by administration’s attempt to wipe findings that don’t align with its priorities, tracker shows*** > > A database of federal law enforcement officer misconduct records. A survey…
    filed under sciencetechnology
  4. CSS: the bomb inside your inbox (portswigger.net)lobsters

    5 points by refp in lobste.rs · 44m ago · lobsters

    > It's quite common for webmail clients to render untrusted CSS in a trusted UI. They attempt to make this safe using CSS sanitization. In this paper [Gareth Heyes] going to show you how to break out of trust boundaries, exfiltrate tokens, compromise 3rd party websites and even steal passwords.
    filed under security
  5. Tsampi BFT: Leaderless One-Round Voting with Parameterized Finality (tsampi.com)lobsters

    1 points by readevalprint in lobste.rs · 2h ago · lobsters

    Tsampi BFT is a leaderless Byzantine fault-tolerant state-replication protocol with one Vote round per Proposed Block and exact-lineage finality in as few as two later Blocks. Its dual-linked Vote chain records both Block-lineage causality and each Validator's endorsement order. Earlier Votes are neither revoked nor reassigned; every successor must prove that it targets a strictly better proposal. A strict supermajority has more than two thirds of the Stake in the Validator set used for a Block. Q1 is the strict-supermajority Vote pass that sets QuorumBlock. Q2 is the later, independently deduplicated strict-supermajority Vote pass that sets CoveredBlock. Q2 starts empty after Q1 closes. A Validator counted in Q1 may count in Q2 only through a different, later Vote carried by a later descendant Block. Proposal admission is parameterized independently of finality. Under an unchanged Validator set and an endorsement threshold of at least two thirds, genesis reaches QuorumBlock in Block 2 and CoveredBlock in Block 3; the steady-state pipeline keeps a one-Block lag between them. Proposal admission may use a lower threshold, but every accepted Block must advance the lineage toward strict-supermajority finality.